Yesterday afternoon, the Concord Monitor informed readers that it was eliminating anonymous posting on its Web site and requiring people to sign up with user names. They also implemented a new plan that will allow "trusted" users to be created and for the community to regulate their site with ratings, in order to stave off any "mean-spirited" comments.
Hey, this is not a huge thing. The company I work for implemented the same change a few months after allowing comments online for many of the same reasons the Monitor is making the change. It was an absolute free-for-all, as it has been on the Monitor's site. And it seems now, the reality of what people think and are willing to say online is a bit too much reality or free speech for the Monitor to handle.
At the same time, anonymity allows people to show their true feelings. Instead of censoring or trying to control the true feelings of people, media outlets should embrace the interaction and learn from what people are saying.
Personally, it's not a big deal to get a user name and continue to post things. You can make up a fake name and fake email and have the same anonymity commenters have now. I do worry about having a trusted user process instead of a free and open process. Does the Monitor really want its Web site to become a flame and rating war like Daily Kos or Blue Hampshire? It would seem to me that a better idea would be to allow the community to freely say what they want without being rated or having their comments disappear because some people don't like them. That is what has happened before on other sites and that's what will happen at the Monitor.
That said, people will be free to comment here as much as they like.
Hey, this is not a huge thing. The company I work for implemented the same change a few months after allowing comments online for many of the same reasons the Monitor is making the change. It was an absolute free-for-all, as it has been on the Monitor's site. And it seems now, the reality of what people think and are willing to say online is a bit too much reality or free speech for the Monitor to handle.
At the same time, anonymity allows people to show their true feelings. Instead of censoring or trying to control the true feelings of people, media outlets should embrace the interaction and learn from what people are saying.
Personally, it's not a big deal to get a user name and continue to post things. You can make up a fake name and fake email and have the same anonymity commenters have now. I do worry about having a trusted user process instead of a free and open process. Does the Monitor really want its Web site to become a flame and rating war like Daily Kos or Blue Hampshire? It would seem to me that a better idea would be to allow the community to freely say what they want without being rated or having their comments disappear because some people don't like them. That is what has happened before on other sites and that's what will happen at the Monitor.
That said, people will be free to comment here as much as they like.
News from ConcordMonitor.com
May 26, 2009
Dear Monitor Online member,
Because you are a registered member of the Concord Monitor online community, I wanted to tell you in advance about some exciting improvements coming to the website tomorrow. We are completely redesigning our reader comments, to make it an even better forum for community dialog.
Some things you'll notice right away:
Comments will now be threaded, making it easier to follow side discussions.
You'll be able to control how you view the comments, switching from having the newest on top (the way we show them now) to having the oldest on top, if you prefer it that way.
You'll be able to preview your comments before you post them. If you notice an error in something you wrote, or you just want to tweak the wording, you now will be able to edit your comment after it's posted, at least until someone responds to it.
You'll be able to e-mail specific comments to friends.
You'll be able to rate comments, so people can quickly find the best comments. (And so we can call attention to the best of the best.)
We've made some changes behind the scenes, too.
First, we will begin requiring registration of all posters. Screen names are fine, of course. But we will no longer publish completely anonymous posts. This should make it easier to follow the comments, and should cut down on sock puppets and spam.
We've also introduced user roles that will allow us to entrust experienced posters with direct, immediate posting, as we currently allow for all registered users. Existing registered users, like you, will be grandfathered in as trusted users. Newly registered users, however, will go through a period when their comments are reviewed before they're posted. Once they've demonstrated that they understand and are willing to follow the discussion guidelines, their comments will go up directly.
On the other hand, if we receive a number of legitimate complaints that a trusted user is violating the discussion guidelines, we can now remove the user's trusted status without having to block the account entirely.
To keep that from happening to you, be sure to check out our revised discussion guidelines and our new Rules of the Road FAQ. In the FAQ, we've tried to lay out in plain language what we hope to see on the comment boards -- a lively, civil discussion, with plenty of room for argument and disagreement but no tolerance for personal attacks, name-calling, derogatory comments, spam or other anti-social behavior.
Thanks for your participation. We hope you like the new features. And if you don't, well, we're sure you'll let us know!
Sincerely,
Geordie Wilson
Publisher, Concord Monitor