Concord School Superintendent Christine Rath responded to a 91-A request today stating that the wife of one of the Commission members "is not employed by the Concord School District."
Due to this clarification, I'm rescinding my previous comments stating that this person should not be allowed to serve on the Commission since there is no conflict of interest. Clearly, anyone who has a spouse who is employed by the school district should not be allowed to serve on the Commission. I certainly hope that others also do not have a conflict of interest.
To correct the record, I'm editing out the previous comments pertaining to this member of the commission and his wife in posts on OurConcord.com.
There is still no word about who the PTO person will be on the Commission.
If anyone is interested in finding out more information about the Commission, please click here: ["COMMISSION TO STUDY THE CONCORD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT CHARTER"].
Due to this clarification, I'm rescinding my previous comments stating that this person should not be allowed to serve on the Commission since there is no conflict of interest. Clearly, anyone who has a spouse who is employed by the school district should not be allowed to serve on the Commission. I certainly hope that others also do not have a conflict of interest.
To correct the record, I'm editing out the previous comments pertaining to this member of the commission and his wife in posts on OurConcord.com.
There is still no word about who the PTO person will be on the Commission.
If anyone is interested in finding out more information about the Commission, please click here: ["COMMISSION TO STUDY THE CONCORD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT CHARTER"].
No comments:
Post a Comment